Keck School of Medicine of USC Program

Internal Medicine residency · Los Angeles, CA · Academic hospital · Pacific

ACGME code: 1400500020
NRMP code: not listed
Setting: Academic hospital
Positions · accreditation: not reported · Initial Accreditation

Sponsors no visa

Only applicants already able to work in the US

Recently started · 2025

What do the marks above mean?

A program joins your list the moment you mark it in any way at all. "Saved" is the total of everything below, not a button of its own.

Priority: How likely you are to apply
- Top choice · applying for certain
- Strong maybe · probably applying
- Backup · worth keeping on the list
Three dots. The more of them filled, the higher the priority: all three for a Top choice, two for a Strong maybe, one for a Backup. Click the dot it already has to clear it.
Flag: One to come back to
A bookmark, and only a bookmark: something to look at again, ask someone about, or check a detail on. It has nothing to do with signalling.
Signal: You plan to spend a signal here
Your specialty gives you a fixed number of ERAS signals. This is where you are thinking of spending them, which is a different question from how much you like a program. Your specialty issues two grades: one click marks a silver, a second makes it gold, a third clears it.
Pinned: Keep it at the top
Holds a program at the top of the browse list whatever the sort is set to. It says nothing about the program; it is somewhere to park the few you keep coming back to.
Note: Anything you want to remember
Your own words, kept in your browser and on your account. Nobody else reads them and they are never used in any score.

Priority or signal? Priority is how much you want a program. A signal is one of the limited number you are allowed to send. A top choice you are certain about may not need one; a reach you would be delighted by often does.

ACGME code: 1400500020
NRMP code: not listed
Setting: Academic hospital
Positions · accreditation: not reported · Initial Accreditation

The numbers

Interview rate: 14.6%; of all applicants
Non-US IMG interview share: 0.0%; of interviews
Interview rate for non-US IMGs: 1.0%; of IMG applicants
Step 2 CK range: 237–264; published band
Positions offered: not reported; PGY-1 seats
ERAS applicants: 1,666; last cycle
Applicants per position: not reported; competition
Resident non-US IMG %: not reported; IM average 33% nationally
Non-US IMG Step 2 range: not reported; of IMGs actually invited
Graduation cutoff: not reported; their site says nothing about one
Step 2 CK hard minimum: not reported; published cutoff

Open the program's own website Current residents Look it up on FREIDA

ACGME 1400500020

Step 2 CK, and where you sit

The band this program actually interviewed in, rather than the minimum it will accept.

237264

Their published range across all applicants is 237 to 264.

This program does not publish a separate range for non-US IMGs, so this is everyone who applied, US graduates included. That group usually scores higher than the one you are in, so treat this as a rough guide rather than the bar you have to clear.

How often they interview non-US IMGs

Non-US IMG interview rate

1%Below average

What signals were worth here

Gold signal interview rate

48%Above average

Silver signal interview rate

52%Very high

Interview rate by how people applied

Gold signal48%27 of 54 interviewed
Silver signal52%192 of 359 interviewed
No signal2%~25 of 1,253 interviewed

Overall: about 243 of 1,666 applicants interviewed (14.6%). A gold signal here raised the interview rate more than 10 times.

Your notes

Your fit

Where this program sits

A raw percentage means little on its own. These are ranks against every Internal Medicine program on this site that reports the same measure.

Interview rate 14.6% better than 69% of programs
Non-US IMG interview share 0.0% better than 9% of programs
Resident non-US IMG share not reported

not reported, so this program is left out of the ranking rather than placed last
Applicants per position not reported

not reported, so this program is left out of the ranking rather than placed last

Ranked against 495–634 programs depending on the measure, out of 716.

How to read those signal numbers

Each meter above fills to this program's rate on a 0–100% scale, and its line marks the median Internal Medicine program on this site that reports the same measure; the word beside the rate says which fifth of those programs it ranks in. The bars underneath are the same rates by how people applied, with the counts each one is made of.

Worth noticing: a silver signal did better here than the higher tier last cycle. That can be a small-sample artefact, but if you are short of the scarcer signal this is a program where spending the other one costs you little.

Worked out from this program's own reported figures, and checked to add back up to its total number of invites.

Contact

Who runs it, and how to reach them, is on the program's own site.

Program website

We publish names here, not staff email addresses: coordinators of established programs did not agree to have their inboxes listed on a public site, and an address published here would be harvested within days. Every program's own contact page is linked above. The one exception is the new programs page, where programs with no track record yet have asked to hear from applicants and their published addresses are shown.

The odds, end to end

Everyone who applied, everyone who was invited, and the seats that exist.

Interview invites are estimated from the reported interview rate. Positions offered is not reported.

This program against the Internal Medicine average

The three measures where programs differ most for an IMG.

No national average is published for non-US IMG interview share, so that bar stands alone. resident non-us img is not reported for this program.

Who applies against who gets interviewed

When these two bars differ, that difference is the most useful thing on this page.

Non-US IMGs are 11% of applicants but only 0% of interviews. A large share of IMG applications here do not convert into interviews.

Part of this breakdown is not reported, so the segments are incomplete.